Woodpecker’s and utility pole damage

Woodpecker’s, which have been notorious in their destructive of utility pole’s, are a protected migratory bird. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) protects all woodpeckers and their nests. This being said, numerous attempts have been made to “repel” woodpecker’s from their damaging effects on utility poles.

Because woodpeckers cause extensive damage in a short period of time, poles can become structurally unsound between inspections which poses a danger to lineman.

Many solutions have been tried and discarded; including but not limited to decoys, objects that move, shine, create noise, smells & odd colors. None of these work for very long because the woodpecker soon realizes that these things do not pose a threat. Barriers such as wire mesh proved to have just as many woodpecker holes as poles without the mesh. The mesh also increases pole conductivity which made it potentially more dangerous for workers. And these are only a few of the many many attempts to stop the damage from woodpeckers.

Woodpeckers will continue to damage poles resulting in millions of dollars of maintenance costs for utilities. Research leading to the development of an effective woodpecker deterrent would result in annual savings of millions of maintenance dollars for utilities.

One solution we know of that is currently successful in thwarting woodpeckers is an item called a Woodpecker Wrap. According to a lineman in the state of Oklahoma, they have woodpeckers in their area that he refers to as “Woodpeckers on Steroids”. The Woodpecker Wrap is the only successful solution they have found.

Flash fire critically injures three at Sinclair oil refinery

A flash fire at the Sinclair oil refinery injured four employees, including three in critical condition at a Colorado hospital.

The flash fire occurred about 10:20 a.m. inside a gas recovery unit on the east side of the oil refinery, said local Sinclair spokesman.

Three of the four injured were flown to the burn center in Greeley, and one was treated and released locally.

This incident at the refinery brings up the age-old debate about safety in a refinery.

An investigation is being launched to better understand why the fire occurred in the first place.

This incident is being investigated to understand what happened and come up with corrective actions to prevent it from occurring again. Two investigators from Occupational and Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) were sent to the scene to investigate the incident.

Electrical Safety New Certifications for Electrical Workers and Supervisors

Over the past 15 years, industry awareness standards regarding safe work practice requirements contained in NFPA 70E®, Electrical Safety in the Workplace®, has increased significantly along with adherence to those requirements. There are a number of reasons for this trend in electrical safety. The electrical industry has strongly supported safety requirements. One reason is the expansion of the hazards covered in NFPA to address both shock and arc-flash hazards, and proactive initiatives on preventing electrical accidents undertaken by federal and state occupational safety regulators.

NFPA has supported this demand for information through the development of “support products” such as the NFPA 70E Handbook, alliances with industry partners such as IEEE and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and through the creation of safety training programs.

This emphasis on training starts with the employer/ employee relationship established in NFPA 70E guidelines. The employer is responsible for establishing an electrically safe environment through implementing an electrical safety program.

The certifications highlight the importance of the relationship between employees and their supervisors in effecting the electrical safety program. Employees perform tasks that are assigned to them by their supervisors, who may be plant managers, safety managers, facility or company owners, or other people who have direct oversight of employees performing tasks that may expose them to electrical hazards. Offering certifications for individuals at both the supervisor and employee levels bridges the understanding and implementation of NFPA 70E across an organization and promotes a solid employer/employee relationship that is a fundamental element of an effective electrical safety program.

These certifications can be used by employers and employees as a standard that indicates a working knowledge of NFPA 70E and the safe work practice that is required.  Implementing these safe work practices will positively impact electrical safety in the workplace and also negate accidents, law suits and ultimately even prevent a catastrophic event.


US Department of Labor’s OSHA cites Sign Source USA for exposing
workers to safety and health hazards at Lima, Ohio, manufacturing plant

LIMA, Ohio – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Sign Source USA with 26 safety and health violations, including exposing workers to fire and explosion hazards. OSHA initiated a safety inspection of the Lima-based custom sign manufacturer’s plant on Dec. 19 based on a complaint and opened a separate health inspection on Jan. 5. Proposed penalties total $67,400.
Eleven serious safety violations involve failing to remove wood and metal scraps from work areas that presented trip and laceration hazards, provide machine guarding on router tables, provide forklift training, mark forklift attachments properly with their load capacities and require the proper personal protective equipment – such as helmets and other headgear – to be worn during welding operations. Several of the violations relate to electrical safety, including a lack of personal protective equipment, failing to require the use of nonconducting headgear and not training workers to recognize unsafe electrical practices.

Several of the eight serious health violations involve fire and explosion hazards, including using paint spray booths with wooden beams covered in flammable materials; improperly discarding spray booth filters, rags and other materials with flammable residue; not grounding metal parts in the spray booth; and not installing a gauge on the spray booth to ensure that proper air velocity was maintained. Additionally, the employer failed to provide a hazard communication training program and conduct medical evaluations for respiratory protection. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Four other-than-serious safety violations include failing to record forklift inspections and maintain OSHA illness and injury logs for 2009, 2010 and 2011. Three other-than-serious health violations related to the company’s respirator protection program include a lack of fit testing and training, and allowing respirators to be used by individuals with facial hair. An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm.

“Sign Source USA is responsible for ensuring that its employees are properly trained and protected from known workplace safety and health hazards that can cause fires, explosions and other incidents that result in injury or illness,” said Kim Nelson, OSHA’s area director in Toledo. “OSHA is committed to protecting workers on the job.”

The company previously was inspected by OSHA in 2006, resulting in citations for 11 violations involving a lack of machine guarding, personal protective equipment, respiratory protection and hazard communication. Sign Source USA has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Any doubts that your company is compliant? Your employees safe?

The 2012 Edition of the NFPA 70E recommendations are in print and take effect January 1, 2012.

Do you and your employees know all of the changes?
Have they been implemented into your Electrical Safety Program?
Do you have an Electrical Safety Program?
Have you had Electrical Safety Training in the last year?

If the answer to any of those questions is no, then contact Macron Safety today!

Call 916-905-6535 or contact us to be certain you are in compliance.


US Labor Department’s OSHA proposes $71,000 in fines to Atlanta-based
 BWAY Corp. for safety, health hazards at Dayton, NJ, plastics facility

DAYTON, N.J. – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited BWAY Corp., headquartered in Atlanta, Ga., for three repeat, three serious and two other-than-serious safety and health violations at the company’s Dayton plastics manufacturing facility. Proposed penalties total $71,000 following an inspection initiated as part of OSHA’s National Emphasis Program on Amputations.

The repeat violations, with $60,000 in penalties, include failing to develop lockout/tagout procedures for the energy sources of specific equipment, conduct and certify monthly crane hook inspections, and protect electrical live parts with approved enclosures. A repeat violation exists when an employer previously has been cited for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years. Similar violations were cited in 2011 at a Macon, Ga., facility.

The serious violations with $11,000 in penalties were cited for failing to address noise hazards and ensure that lockout procedures of energy sources were in place to prevent amputation hazards. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

The other-than-serious violations, with no monetary penalties, include failing to notify employees of noise sampling results and evaluate powered industrial truck operators during a three-year period. An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm.

“These violations put workers’ lives at risk and could cause very serious injuries or possible death,” said Patricia Jones, director of OSHA’s Avenel Area Office. “Employers are legally responsible for ensuring a safe and healthful workplace.”

BWAY Corp., which employs about 135 workers at the Dayton site, manufactures rigid metal, plastic and hybrid containers at multiple facilities throughout the U.S. The company has 15 business days from receipt of the citations to comply, ask for an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the citations and proposed penalties before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

Any doubts that your company is compliant? Your employees safe?

The 2012 Edition of the NFPA 70E recommendations are in print and take effect January 1, 2012.

Do you and your employees know all of the changes?
Have they been implemented into your Electrical Safety Program?
Do you have an Electrical Safety Program?
Have you had Electrical Safety Training in the last year?

If the answer to any of those questions is no, then contact Macron Safety today!

Call 916-905-6535 or contact us to be certain you are in compliance.

OSHA cites Spurgeon Vineyards and Winery
 with 12 violations including lack of guarding and training

HIGHLAND, Wis. – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited Spurgeon Vineyards and Winery LLC in Highland, Wis., with 12 safety and health – including nine repeat – violations for failing to provide fall protection and a hazard communication program. The citations are the result of a follow-up investigation conducted in January. Proposed penalties total $71,280.

“Employers are responsible for knowing the hazards that exist in their workplaces, and failing to take basic safety precautions to protect workers is unacceptable,” said Kim Stille, OSHA’s area director in Madison. “Repeat violations portray a disregard for workers’ safety and health. OSHA is committed to protecting workers on the job.”

Seven repeat safety violations involve failing to protect workers from fall hazards greater than 4 feet on wine tanks and catwalks, implement and train workers on a lockout/tagout program to control the release of hazardous energy resulting in an arc flash event, as well as allowing workers to use damaged electrical cords.

Additionally, the company has been cited with two repeat health violations for failing to implement a personal protective equipment hazard assessment, provide a hazard communication program and training, and provide material safety data sheets for chemicals used in the workplace. A repeat violation exists when an employer previously was cited for the same or a similar violation of any standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years. Similar violations were cited in July 2011.

A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

Spurgeon Vineyards and Winery has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. The previous inspection was in 2011, and 24 violations were issued.

Tworkers, the public should call OSHA’s toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742) or the agency’s Madison Area Office at 608-441-5388.

OSHA cites company in Georgia
 for exposing employees to amputation and electrical shock hazards

CALHOUN, Ga. OSHA has cited violations that involve failing to develop and use lockout/tagout procedures to control the energy sources of equipment; remove a forklift with an inoperable horn from service; protect workers from electrocution hazards; and provide guards on blades, cutting heads, sprocket wheels, chains, shafts, belts and pulleys. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

“This inspection has identified violations that involve possible amputations by unguarded equipment and electrical shock dangers,” said Andre Richards, director of OSHA’s Atlanta-West Area Office. “Employers cannot wait for an OSHA inspection to identify hazards that are exposing their employees to serious injuries. It is good business to implement preventive programs and systems that ensure such hazards are identified and corrected as part of day-to-day operations.”

Nance Carpet and Rug, which employs about 55 workers at its Calhoun facility, manufactures area rugs and remnants for residential and commercial purposes. The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and proposed penalties to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

To ask questions, obtain compliance assistance, file a complaint, or report workplace hospitalizations, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, the public should call OSHA’s toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742) or the agency’s Atlanta-West office at 678-903-7301.

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA’s role is to ensure these conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

Everything you wanted to know about Arc Flash safety and then some!

Everything you wanted to know about Arc Flash safety and then some! This article breaks down the anatomy of arc flash hazard calculations in an easily understandable format. Also, this information will help you to understand not only the risks involved at a particular site but the type of safety wear that would be required for that specific job site.

A Tidal Wave of Arc-Flash Hazard Calculation Studies by Jim Phillips