Arc Flash Definitions

Arc Flash: An arcing fault is the flow of current through the air between phase conductors or phase conductors and neutral or ground. An arcing fault can release tremendous amounts of concentrated radiant energy at the point of the arcing in a small fraction of a second resulting in extremely high temperatures, a tremendous pressure blast, and shrapnel hurling at high velocity.

ASTM: American Society for Testing and Materials

Arc Thermal Performance Value (ATPV): This value is presented in calories per square centimeter and represents the maximum capability for arc flash protection of a particular garment. This rating also applies to fabrics, however, a garment made from more than one layer of arc flash rated fabric will have a calorie per square centimeter rating greater than the sum of the ATPV ratings of the original fabrics. The calories per square centimeter rating of most arc flash protection suits, coveralls, and coats is commonly sewn into the fabric in large letters on the outside of the garment.

Calories per Centimeter Squared (cal/cm2): This is a number identifying the amount of energy that can be delivered to a point at a particular distance from an arc flash. Once this value is known, the ATPV rating of the flash clothing required for work at that distance from the potential flash hazard is also known. See ATPV.

Calorie: A calorie is the energy required to raise one gram of water one degree Celsius at one atmosphere. The onset of second-degree burns may occur at 1.2 calories per centimeter squared per second. One calorie per centimeter squared per second can be equal to holding your finger over the tip of the flame of a cigarette lighter for one second.

De-energized: Free from any electrical connection to a source of potential difference and from electrical charge; not having a potential different from that of the earth.

Electrical Hazard: A dangerous condition such that contact or equipment failure can result in electric shock, arc flash burn, thermal burn, or blast.

Electrical Safety: Recognizing hazards associated with the use of electrical energy and taking precautions so that hazards do not cause injury or death.

Electrically Safe Work Condition: A state in which the conductor or circuit part to be worked on or near has been disconnected from energized parts, locked/tagged in accordance with established standards, tested to ensure the absence of voltage, and grounded if determined necessary.

Energy Breakopen Threshold (EBT): Primarily, this addresses the physical strength of the fabric with respect to thermal energy and at what arc-flash value the fabric will fail.

Flame-Resistant (FR): The property of a material whereby combustion is prevented, terminated, or inhibited following the application of a flaming or non-flaming source of ignition, with or without subsequent removal of the ignition source.

Flash Hazard: A dangerous condition associated with the release of energy caused by an electric arc.

Flash Hazard Analysis: appropriate levels of PPE.

Flash Protection Boundary: An approach limit at a distance from exposed live parts within which a person could receive a second degree burn if an electrical arc flash were to occur.

Flash Suit: A complete FR clothing and equipment system that covers the entire body, except for the hands and feet. This includes pants, jacket, and bee-keeper-type hood fitted with a face shield.

Hazard Risk Category (HRC): Categories defined by NFPA 70E to explain protection levels needed when performing tasks. The values range from -1 to 4. ATPV rated PPE is required for categories 1 through 4 as follows:
22 2 2

IEEE:

Incident Energy: The amount of energy impressed on a surface, a certain distance from the source, generated during an electrical arc event. One of the units used to measure incident energy is calories per centimeter squared (cal/cm2).

Limited Approach Boundary: An approach limit at a distance from an exposed live part within which a shock hazard exists.

NEC The National Electrical Code:

NFPA: The National Fire Protection Association.

NFPA 70E Standard: Standard that provides guidance on implementing appropriate work practices that are required to safeguard workers from injury while working on or near exposed electrical conductors or circuit parts that could become energized.

OSHA: Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
OSHA 29 CFR 1910, Subpart S-Electrical: Occupational Safety and Health Standards. Section 1910 Subpart S-Electrical Standard number 1910.333 specifically addresses Standards for Work Practices.

Prohibited Approach Boundary: An approach limit at a distance from an exposed live part within which work is considered the same as making contact with the live part.

Restricted Approach Boundary: An approach limit at a distance from an exposed live part within which there is an increased risk of shock, due to electrical arc over combined with inadvertent movement, for personnel working in close proximity to the live part.

Shock Hazard: A dangerous electrical condition associated with the possible release of energy caused by contact or approach to energized parts.

Voltage, Nominal: A nominal value assigned to a circuit or system for the purpose of conveniently designating its voltage class. The actual voltage at which a circuit operates can vary from thenominal within a range that permits satisfactory operation of equipment.

Working Near (live parts): Any activity inside a limited approach boundary.

Working On (live parts): Coming in contact with live parts with the hands, feet, or other body parts, with tools, probes, or with test equipment, regardless of the personal protective equipment a person is wearing.

Arc Flash burned over 50% of lineman’s body

A lineman was operating a scissor lift at an electrical substation when electricity arced and touched the corner of the lift. The 25 year-old apprentice lineman was badly burned over 50% of his body. The electricity traveled to the ground and back, resulting in severe burns. Without electrical safety equipment, it is speculated that the incident would have resulted in his death.  Arc flashes resulting in more than 25% body burns usually means the clothing ignited or the arc tracked through the moisture from sweat on the body.  When clothing ignites, arc rated daily wear can prevent most or all of the burns.

This lineman underwent a skin-grafting procedure on his right hand but he still suffers from burns to his face and elsewhere on his body. He also experienced swelling on his face and pneumonia as a result.

Do you have OSHA mandated training and safety implemented for your employees? Documented Safety training along with arc rated daily wear & tools could make all the difference between life and death. Not only are your employees safe; but your company is saved the financial devastation of lawsuits and fines that come from not being OSHA compliant.

Macron Safety is your safety solutions partner. Our mission is to help save lives, reduce injuries and protect companies, large and small, from being decimated by lawsuits, fines and most importantly, the loss of life.

Click here to read more about Lineman’s Rehabilitation Following Electrical Incident

What is an Arc Flash?

An arc flash may occur at a transformer, switch gear, or high voltage cables when electricity is suddenly and violently released. Injuries due to an arc flash are heightened in an enclosed space.

Are you aware of OSHA 2012 safety requirements regarding electricity? Are your employees safe on the job site? Are they safety trained to work around, near or with electricity? Is the training documented? Do they have the proper safety gear and tools? If not; you are liable for all injuries and death that occur under your employ.

Safety training not only assures that you and your company are OSHA compliant, but it saves lives and millions of dollars in lawsuits and fines.

Macron Safety is your training solutions partner. Our mission is to keep workers safe and save companies (large and small) millions in lawsuits and OSHA fines.

Company and employee fined more than $171,000 after arc flash incident

An employee along with a company in Windsor, Ontario (ThyssenKrupp Industrial Services Canada Inc.,  doing business as ThyssenKrupp Hearn Division), was fined $160,000 for an O.H.S.A. (Occupational Health and Safety Act) violation after a worker was seriously injured.

On Feb. 25, 2009, a worker was doing electrical upgrades at the company’s warehouse in Windsor. As the worker was removing conductors from an electrical panel, a bare conductor touched the side of the electrical panel, causing an arc flash. The worker sustained serious electrical burns.

A Ministry of Labour investigation found that the electrical panel was not disconnected from the power source, locked out or tagged before the work started.

ThyssenKrupp Hearn Division, was found guilty of failing to ensure that the electrical panel was disconnected, locked out and tagged prior to work being done. Don Hearn Jr., employed as a supervisor for the company was found guilty of the same and fined $11,000.

If there is an Arc Flash will the insulation inside your hard hat melt?

Oberon Arc Flash Hard Hat Test

A new test method is being developed for arc exposure in hard hats – due to concerns in the industry that the foam inside insulated hard hats can melt and/or ignite. Recently, Oberon conducted arc tests on Type 2, Class E hard hats with foam liners. For arc flash protection, hard hats are worn with an arc rated face shield or an arc rated hood with a shield window. In the NFPA 70E Hazard/Risk Categories (HRC) 1, 2 and 2-star designated for incident energy levels from 1.2 to 8 cal/cm2, hard hats are equipped with an arc rated face shield. For HRC3 and HRC4, designated for incident energies above 8 cal/cm2 and up to 40 cal/cm2, arc rated hoods are required. Within the utility industry, which is excluded from the NFPA 70E standard, hard hats can be directly exposed well above an incident energy of 8 cal/cm2 when used with a balaclava hood and an arc rated face shield or arc rated goggles. The intent of these Oberon tests was to conduct arc exposures in the range of 25 cal/cm2 with and without an arc rated face shield protecting the hard hat liner.

Oberon Face Shield TestIn the first test, the hard hats/face shield assembly was initially mounted facing the arc exposure in the standard configuration for the ASTM F2178 test method for face protective products. The hard hat was labeled Dynamic HP542 hardhat with foam liner, made in Canada, CSA Z94.1-05 & ANSI Z89.1-2009,Type 2, Class E, Size 53-64 cm, 65/8-8, HPDE, and was equipped with an Oberon ARCX 12 cal shield. As expected, the face shield protected the hard hat and liner. There was no after-flame from the hard hat or liner and no melting, dripping or damage to the hard hat or liner.

In the second test two hard hats/face shield assemblies were mounted backwards on the mannequin head so that the back sides of the two hard hats were facing the arc exposure.
Oberon Arc Flash TestIn this orientation, the face shield does not protect the hard hat and liner. However, there was no after-flame from the hard hat or liner, and no melting, drip- ping or damage to the hard hat or liner with an incident energy exposure on position A of 27.0 cal/cm2 and on position B 23.3 cal/cm2.

Certainly at some level of arc flash exposure, a hard hat and liner can exhibit ignition, melting and dripping. The ASTM F18 Committee test method development will determine the exposure level at which these phenomena can be initiated. Based on this limited testing, it appears that ignition, melting and dripping are not initiated at exposures up to approximately 25 cal/cm2.

Article submitted by Oberon Company.